NEBOSH IG2 — Risk Assessment Assignment
IG2 requires a practical risk assessment of your own workplace — not a classic exam-hall session.
You build it out to around 3,000 words with at least five clear hazards: describe the harm that could arise, the associated risk (likelihood × severity), the people exposed, existing and recommended controls, and, where useful, legal or normative references.
What is IG2?
Unit IG2 (Risk Assessment), part of the NEBOSH International General Certificate, is a practical assignment: you describe an existing workplace you can access, gather real observations and communicate about risks and controls the way a junior HSE professional would to management — only in a formal written document rather than verbally.
Unlike IG1, IG2 is not an open-book theory exam. There is no large scenario-question session, but a dossier that shows you methodically recognise hazards, set priorities and justify suitable controls. The assignment tests application of knowledge, not just recognition of terms.
Structure of the assignment
A solid IG2 document usually covers the following blocks:
- Situation and scope — where you have been, the boundaries of your risk assessment: date, part of the organisation.
- Organisational context — core activity, relevant HSE roles and which documents you consulted.
- Legal and normative context — short, relevant references (e.g. national law versus UK/EU where applicable to your case).
- Methodology — how you observed, who you interviewed, which checklist or route you followed.
- At least five hazards in separate blocks — each: description, those exposed, existing controls, a quantified or qualified estimate of the risk, and recommended improvements with owners and a timeline.
- Conclusions and recommendations to management — focused on the largest residual risks (risks remaining after controls are applied).
- Appendices — a simple sketch, photo or table where permitted.
Step-by-step approach
- Preparation and approval — permission, safety rules, PPE requirements and planning a walk-round without disrupting work.
- Hazard scan — systematically go through energies, equipment, human behaviour and environment; note work processes where a risk builds up.
- Select five strong hazards — choose different types (e.g. physical and ergonomic and organisational) so breadth is visible.
- Risk rating and rationale — explain why likelihood and impact are high; avoid arbitrary labels.
- Improvement programme — work along the hierarchy of control, from elimination to PPE; add a KPI or follow-up inspection where useful.
Example hazards by sector
Office: display screen/RSI health, fire and evacuation, work stress/schedule pressure, cable trips and slips at entrances, acoustics and concentration load.
Construction: falls from height, collapsing excavation walls, crane/lifting lines, dust including silica, power tools on temporary supply, site traffic.
Port: conflict with internal transport and crane runways, working near water or jetties, dangerous goods (ADR/IMDG), noise and vibration, hot work and flammable environments, communication during lifting and manoeuvring.
Healthcare: biological agents and exposure, lifting and patient mobility, aggression towards staff, chemical agents (disinfectants), electrical equipment on wards, slippery floors after cleaning.
Use this as inspiration; your own workplace determines what can be honestly described.
Top 5 common mistakes
- Copying hazards from the internet without local evidence — marking stops at generic clichés.
- The same hazard five times with minor variation — does not count as a broad panorama.
- Putting PPE first — examiners expect higher-level controls first under the hierarchy of control.
- A risk matrix without explanation — only coloured boxes without a sentence about who could be harmed and when.
- Legal references too vague — use precise article-level detail only where truly relevant, but do name the frameworks that apply to the workplace.
NEBOSH marking criteria
Although wording shifts slightly per cohort, markers almost always weigh these areas:
- Application of the five main risk assessment steps from identification through to the feedback loop.
- Depth per hazard: at least five distinct hazards with a real workplace photo or observation where possible.
- Technical language in line with the NEBOSH lexicon (hazard, risk, control).
- A concrete improvement list aimed at management, with priority and ownership — no vague generalities.
- Professional report layout, correct references and word count within official guidelines.
Always consult your official NEBOSH study guide for the latest mark-scheme nuances.
Ready for guidance on IG2?
See how our Rotterdam class combines IG1 theory with practical coaching towards a strong IG2 submission, fully in English.